Legal Fellowship Program · 2026

International legal responses to the systematic oppression of Afghan women

A three-part, peer-reviewed series examining the gap between recognition and enforcement—and between symbolic commitments and meaningful accountability.

3
Legal papers
Peer reviewed
Publication series
September
2026
Cover of Beyond Symbolism
Cover of From Gender Persecution to Gender Apartheid
Cover of Universal Jurisdiction and Taliban Accountability

AAF Legal Paper Series 01—03

The collection

Three papers. One accountability question.

Each paper tests a different legal pathway against the realities of enforcement, jurisdiction, and political will.

Beyond Symbolism report cover Read the paper
Paper 01International Criminal Court

Beyond Symbolism

Can the ICC Deliver Meaningful Accountability for the Systematic Oppression of Afghan Women?

Assesses the capacity and limitations of the International Criminal Court in addressing these harms.

From Gender Persecution to Gender Apartheid report cover Read the paper
Paper 02International Court of Justice

From Gender Persecution to Gender Apartheid

What the International Court of Justice Can and Cannot Do for Afghan Women

Examines gender apartheid as a legal framework and the possibilities and limits of action before the ICJ.

Universal Jurisdiction and Taliban Accountability report cover Read the paper
Paper 03Domestic courts

Universal Jurisdiction and Taliban Accountability

Legal Promise and Practical Limits

Examines the legal promise and practical limits of universal jurisdiction as a pathway to Taliban accountability.

Series note

From recognition to enforcement

This paper series examines the evolving international legal and policy responses to the systematic oppression of Afghan women. “From Gender Persecution to Gender Apartheid” explores the legal foundations and arguments for recognizing gender apartheid as a distinct crime under international law. “Beyond Symbolism” assesses the capacity and limitations of existing accountability mechanisms, particularly the International Criminal Court. “Universal Jurisdiction and Taliban Accountability” examines universal jurisdiction as a pathway to accountability.

Together, the papers seek to bridge the gap between recognition and enforcement, and between symbolic commitments and meaningful accountability.

Accountability requires more than recognition. It requires legal pathways capable of moving from principle to practice.

About the work

The AAF Legal Fellowship Program

The series was developed through the Afghan-American Foundation Legal Fellowship Program for legal scholars, policymakers, advocates, donors, and other expert audiences.

Authored by KI, Legal Fellow, Afghan-American Foundation, with guidance and editorial review from Mustafa Babak.

Explore AAF’s work

Research & thought leadership

Advancing accountability. Elevating Afghan perspectives.

Explore all AAF resources